Our cookies

We use cookies, which are small text files, to improve your experience on our website.
You can allow or reject non essential cookies or manage them individually.

Reject allAllow all

More options  •  Cookie policy

Our cookies

Allow all

We use cookies, which are small text files, to improve your experience on our website. You can allow all or manage them individually.

You can find out more on our cookie page at any time.

EssentialThese cookies are needed for essential functions such as logging in and making payments. Standard cookies can’t be switched off and they don’t store any of your information.
AnalyticsThese cookies help us collect information such as how many people are using our site or which pages are popular to help us improve customer experience. Switching off these cookies will reduce our ability to gather information to improve the experience.
FunctionalThese cookies are related to features that make your experience better. They enable basic functions such as social media sharing. Switching off these cookies will mean that areas of our website can’t work properly.

Save preferences

Will the next generation levy happen?

22 November 2009

Earlier this week, I attended the latest and largest event on next generation access organised by the Community Broadband Network. This was a one and a half day conference at the Royal Armories.

The event was addressed by both Opposition spokesperson Ed Vaizey and Government Minister Stephen Timms. I asked each about the proposal in the Digital Britain Final Report that there be a next generation levy, that is 50 p per month per fixed line to help fund the roll-out of next generation access to the so-called final third of the country.

Ed Vaizey was totally opposed to the proposal which he called "this evil Labour tax". He said that it was "an analogue solution to a digital problem". He was concerned that much of a next generation fund would be swallowed up by administrative and consultants' costs and that in any event the sums raised by the levy would be inadequate but, above all, he did not favour "a top-down approach".

By contrast, Stephen Timms argued that the levy was necessary if NGA was to reach most parts of the country and he was determined to see the measure in the Finance Bill. He acknowledged that there is a political convention that, if a General Election is called before a Finance Bill has reached the Statute Book, then the controversial parts are dropped and a short uncontroversial Bill is passed. In that context and referring to the prospect of the levy staying in the Bill, he admitted that "There is scope for the Opposition to make that difficult".  He insisted "I want it in the Bill" but conceded "I cannot give you a cast-iron guarantee".

You can hear the full record of my question to the Minister and his response by clicking here and scrolling down to "Stephen Timms MP answers questions at NextGen09 (1)".

Categories:

If you have any difficulties accessing content on this page, please email us at contact@communicationsconsumerpanel.org.uk